About

Mashed Radish is John Kelly’s effort to get to the bottom of words that are on the top of our minds.

In each post, he uncovers the etymology of a notable word in the present—whether from news, culture, work, everyday life, or sometimes just out of sheer delight or curiosity—to discover new insights or fresh perspectives from its past. With a little whimsy, and a lot of word facts, along the way.

Because every word has a prize inside. Since 2013.



John Kelly

I have always had this way I can’t help but see the world—and that’s by wondering why we call things what we do.

By wondering why words, whether fancy like pulchritudinous or functional like by, have taken the shape that they have. By marveling that we have all these words, that we have this thing called language, in the first place.

And so began a lifelong fascination with etymology.

After having lived and traveled all around, I have resettled in my hometown, Cincinnati, Ohio, with my wife Olivia, our dog Hugo, and bottomless cups of decaf.

I previously worked as Vice President at Dictionary.com, have appeared across online media, radio, and TV as an expert on words, and have regularly published in such outlets as Slate, Atlas Obscura, Mental Floss, Oxford Dictionaries, Emojipedia, and more.

Prior to my work in words, I served as an educator in various roles, focusing on underserved populations, especially students with disabilities and from low-income backgrounds. 

In 2016, I read the complete works of Shakespeare and wrote about the experience on my other site, Shakespeare Confidential.

Contact

Follow me as @mashedradish.bsky.social on Bluesky. Connect me with on LinkedIn. Email me at mashedradish@gmail.com.



What is etymology?

Etymology is the study of where words come from and how their form and meaning change over time.

What is the etymology of the word etymology?

Recorded in English since the late 1400s, etymology ultimately derives from a Greek word whose roots are etymos, “true, real,” and logos, “word, reason.”

So, etymology is, literally, “the study of the true meanings of words.” But this is where we need to be careful of what’s called the etymological fallacy.

The etymological fallacy argues that the “true meaning”—read, “correct meaning”—of a word is its original meaning.

Language evolves. The form and meaning of words, due to a range of factors, evolve. That’s what true and real. Etymology is just where words started and where they have gone over time.

A blog about etymology deserves a good origin all of its own.

Etymology involves breaking down words into their roots. The word for “root” in Latin, to which English owes a great deal of its lexicon, is radix, source of such words as radical—and radish. And “breaking down” a word is a bit like mashing it up, no? Voilà. Mashed Radish.

What is the “m ʃ r ʃ” at the end of posts?

The “m ʃ r ʃ” you find at the end of many posts is an idiosyncratic sign-off that plays on the pronunciation of Mashed Radish.

The long s character you see is called esh, and in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) it represents the sh sound used in Mashed. Radish. In linguistics, that sh sound is officially known as a voiceless palatal fricative.

The esh symbol closely resembles the integral symbol used in calculus—and I like to think that etymologies have a way of bringing together, or integrating, a lot of different, often unrelated things.

As a garnish, when I was young, I had for a little time a speech impediment, struggling to pronounce that very sh and related sounds. Mashed Radish, in name and representation, is a lighthearted allusion to this personal past.

Where do the drawings in each post come from?

Each post, I try my own hand sketching up a quick doodle that corresponds to the etymological topics at hand. If you come across any older posts where the drawings actually look good, those are likely by my brother, Andrew Kelly.


Selected Bibliography

My bookshelf, print and digital, is always growing. Right now, I am primarily indebted to the following sources. They are incredible go-tos, springboards, cross references, and rabbit holes:

  • Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (Ed. C.T. Onions)
  • Oxford English Dictionary
  • Online Etymology Dictionary (Ed. Douglas Harper)
  • Walter W. Skeat’s An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language
  • Ernest Weekely’s An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English
  • Joseph E. Shipley’s The Origin of English Words
  • Ibid., Dictionary of Word Origins
  • Eric Partridge’s A Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English
  • Anatoly Liberman’s An Analytical Dictionary of English Etymology
  • Ernest Klein’s A Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language
  • Emmauele Baumgartner and Philippe Menard’s Dictionnaire Étymologique
  • John C. Traupman’s The New College Latin & English Dictionary
  • Liddell & Scott’s An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon


52 responses to “About”

  1. […] Kelly at Mashed Radish: I love words, you love words, I torture words but John explains with humour and with topical […]

  2. Occasionally, I come across your blog at oxforddictionaries.
    You come across as a political activist quite often. You don’t stick to the etymology, but peremptorily assert biases as if they were facts.
    Would you dare to embark on the endless toil of proving the realism of those statements?

  3. Out of curiosity, how many hits do you get a day?

    1. 1%2527%2522

  4. “[…] the final solution is the genocide of Jewish people […]”
    Read David Irving’s “Hitler’s War”.
    Read, also, what historians of good repute say about David Irving and his methodology.

  5. “Land’s End officially has an apostrophe between the ‘d’ and the ‘s’ in a win for grammar pedants across the country.”
    For you, minimal grammar is pedantry? Or, you have a personal definition for the word?!

    “Trump’s critics see shekel as a dog whistle for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories of a Jewish-controlled media and stereotypes about money and greed.”
    Inform yourself!

    “[..] for the Trumps, already dogged by charges of anti-Semitism, shekel is an unfortunate, shall we say, choice of words.”
    Who, do you think, gave his son-in-law permission to work with Israel for the benefit of the latter?

    Generally, you venture fatuous political statements. Stick to etymology.

  6. John Kelly it was awesome reading your work. Inspired.

  7. Hey – I just found this blog after researching the word “bastille”. And now I’ve spent (too) much time reading some of your other posts. I love your style and content, and the enthusiasm and curiosity that you inject into each post. Thank you!

    P.s. never before have I felt such an onus to check my grammar and spelling for a simple comment as I have now

  8. Hello, John – I’m an ESL teacher and some Chinese students were telling me today that when they translate “insist,” “persist,” and “resist,” there is only one equivalent word in Chinese for all of these English words. So I decided to do a little research and came up on the article you wrote about “sistere,” and your blog. I’m also intrigued by etymology and word origins. So thank you, and I’ll be back for more reading in the future!

    1. Hi Joanna from David Fraser. I think your students are pulling your leg. There are perfectly good and distinct Chinese words for those three. 堅持 jianchi [insist] can also serve for persist, although there are several other translations such as 持續 chixu [continue]. Resist is another matter; it’s generally translated as 抵制 dizhi [as in 抵制外貨, dizhi waihuo, boycott foreign goods] and 反抗 fankang, for resisting the enemy. The first term, jianchi, may work for resist but I haven’t seen it used that way. Looking forward to reading about ‘sistere’. Cheers, David

  9. Wow. I was just going to leave a comment saying how excited I was as a fellow word nerd to have found this blog — falling down rabbit holes while binging on word etymologies, relations and cognates is a sort of guilty pleasure of mine — but THEN I got the additional bonus of perusing through the previous comments peppered through the years with the occasional harmless nutbaggery, full-on rants and, um, I’ll go with “esoteric digressions” that, I mean, hey, perhaps one might ought to expect to be par for the course for most bloggers. Comment sections — particularly those presumably unmoderated (or not overly restricted by moderators) — are another personal indulgence, so thanks for allowing all THAT to stay up, pristine in form. Seriously, chef’s kiss.

  10. I love the design of this website. Simple but perfect and totally fit for purpose. Did you build it yourself? Or is it a template?

Leave a comment